The real power is to be able to deal with emptiness
–
The challenge is to perceive and to understand the free and empty space or the place where something sudden could happen, something casual without any known cause, without God involved. To attribute in a way, the claim to the chaotic. To include it, peeping the gravitation that has a disconcerting nature, which resists the ancient attempts to incorporate to the quantum theory . Chaos is a way of order. Reason can´t exclude it.
The quantum emptiness is the state that possesses the minimum energy. It doesn’t mean having a minimum particle in its interior. However, the quantum emptiness isn’t so since it has electromagnetic fluctuating waves, and particles jumping in its interior.
This simile from Physics could be useful to understand, not mechanically, that inside the emptiness there is always something. And in my conceptualization, it is there where the place resides.
“We also find in the death of God the explicit rejection of every morality, and especially the Judeo-Christian morality. The good, from Plato and along the history of the philosophy, has usually been linked to the existence of God, in the foundation of the Christian thought as well as the Kantian thought. The death of God involves unmasking the interests that underline the genealogy of the moral criteria. For Nietzsche Christian virtues like humbleness, obedience, sympathy, and service come from the men of the flock, who unable of creating superior values self-scorn as losers and they submit to herd antivital instincts. The Christianity is hostile to the nature and the life of this world, the only one that exists. But with the death of God the Christian virtues not only lack sense but also the supposed objectivity, universality and rationality of the ethical principles. That’s why it’s reasonable that Nietzsche rejects the socialism and the democracy because they are the secularization of the Christian values and therefore the political exponents of a flock moral.
Finally, the death of God must be the starting point of a new anthropology: The superman. The man that accepts that we exist without God, that man that lives in the world, that accepts completely this life the way it is. That man who creates values, and doesn’t stay in the emptiness, that has triggered the absence of God, that sets up from his “self” overcoming his nihilism.
If God died, everything lacks sense, there aren’t founded moral values and the man is the god of its land and its destiny.
According to Nietzsche, the great mission of superman is to leave the destructive nihilism and to create something new without God, to start to sail, like free spirits, across a sea without direction towards a new dawn.”
(As Enrique Bonete said in his book “Nietzsche and the death of God”)
Exposición individual – Galería Contemporánea, Marbella
Would we be before the missing link in the same way that in the Darwin theory of the evolution? Or as Stephen Hawking said “does the universe extend to the space endlessly? And if it was true that “although the universe seems to have the same aspect everywhere, it changes with the passing of time” and we are before at least, two scientific claims:
FIRST—The universe extends endlessly
SECOND—The universe changes with the passing of time
These two conclusions would be enough to question almost all the things we know in other fields, then we could think in the socio-spatial field that:
FIRST—The subject extends or exceeds complete objectivity inside the unconscious.
SECOND—The subject is a field of tensions, timeless, that changes and develops or succumbs in this double sense that is sometimes interpreted in the dreams, according to Sigmund Freud ´s theory.
In this way, immersing in the past in an analytic act, associating in the analysis, could indicate that the time has only one direction, that in the subject area, the time focuses on multiple places and mixes with the present and the past and future, with that ”magical” capacity with which the psychoanalysis tackle the treatment”.
These empty spaces of the knowledge in science and psychology, are also present in the complete development of the mind, even in those games like chess or the Go in which we try to manipulate the empty space in our favour searching positions on the board where we make unexpected movements get a benefit and to win.
In football terms, which shouldn’t be seen as minor art, handling the emptiness helped to lay the foundations of the game with the empty space getting such a position that could lead to the long-awaited goal and together with other strategic movements would reach an assured success.
In chess, more complex than football, there is a similar idea since it is about monopolizing the centre of the board with the goal of getting a solid position and in this way being the leader in the game.
Few times, we get to beat a competitor in this category, that a player gets the empty space in the centre of the board. However, this advantage isn’t always decisive, or harmful for the following developments of the game.
The first great theoreticians of chess understood that the control of the centre of the board was the Cartesian axis to win a game.
Kasparov, a fuori clase, beats the most modern computers, analysts and even his rivals. Then, he decides to deal with Politics and faces Puttin himself, with a free market individualist speech. He has never forgotten the centre of the board, not even in Politics.
Maradona, another fuori clase, that used to see the 360º of the field all the time, in front of him or behind him, on his right or on his left, and used to place the ball where one player from his team had to reach and generally with his back to the defender and wrongfooting him. In politics he has done the opposite. He has hugged Chavez and Fidel and has tattooed Che together with his mother and his grandson showing the latent contradiction between what it could be and what it is. The same has happened to his career of continuous rebirth, self boycott, drugs and genius on the same board. Beating nobody is like beating all the rivals, in the gullible Maradonian universe.
Messi is the adaptation to the rule. He is great, but he doesn’t speak outside the field, he is the player par excellence, the distinguished soloist in the group. No words.
In Diego Maradona the use of the emptiness appears in a simple way creating the option of a positional benefit in the game that has changed football for ever. The excess of words has removed brightness and meaning in the dawn of his career
Then, the next game always starts. Anyway the next one will be another match. However, each game is a matter of life and death.
The space can be empty, but not the place since it is the sum of several physical, symbolic, magical, real or virtual elements, which feeds and generates this subject, sometimes without taking notice of this.
These elements take up that space, which paraphrasing Einstein theory, would be something like the “socio-psychological permanent feature” like underlying energy in “the empty space”
The fact that the emptiness is different from the void is fascinating, and it is even more fascinating that it can cause over itself a constructive effect of the subject’s parts which leads him through a new path.
The real power is to be able to deal with emptiness
–
The challenge is to perceive and to understand the free and empty space or the place where something sudden could happen, something casual without any known cause, without God involved. To attribute in a way, the claim to the chaotic. To include it, peeping the gravitation that has a disconcerting nature, which resists the ancient attempts to incorporate to the quantum theory . Chaos is a way of order. Reason can´t exclude it.
The quantum emptiness is the state that possesses the minimum energy. It doesn’t mean having a minimum particle in its interior. However, the quantum emptiness isn’t so since it has electromagnetic fluctuating waves, and particles jumping in its interior.
This simile from Physics could be useful to understand, not mechanically, that inside the emptiness there is always something. And in my conceptualization, it is there where the place resides.
“We also find in the death of God the explicit rejection of every morality, and especially the Judeo-Christian morality. The good, from Plato and along the history of the philosophy, has usually been linked to the existence of God, in the foundation of the Christian thought as well as the Kantian thought. The death of God involves unmasking the interests that underline the genealogy of the moral criteria. For Nietzsche Christian virtues like humbleness, obedience, sympathy, and service come from the men of the flock, who unable of creating superior values self-scorn as losers and they submit to herd antivital instincts. The Christianity is hostile to the nature and the life of this world, the only one that exists. But with the death of God the Christian virtues not only lack sense but also the supposed objectivity, universality and rationality of the ethical principles. That’s why it’s reasonable that Nietzsche rejects the socialism and the democracy because they are the secularization of the Christian values and therefore the political exponents of a flock moral.
Finally, the death of God must be the starting point of a new anthropology: The superman. The man that accepts that we exist without God, that man that lives in the world, that accepts completely this life the way it is. That man who creates values, and doesn’t stay in the emptiness, that has triggered the absence of God, that sets up from his “self” overcoming his nihilism.
If God died, everything lacks sense, there aren’t founded moral values and the man is the god of its land and its destiny.
According to Nietzsche, the great mission of superman is to leave the destructive nihilism and to create something new without God, to start to sail, like free spirits, across a sea without direction towards a new dawn.”
(As Enrique Bonete said in his book “Nietzsche and the death of God”)
Exposición individual – Galería Contemporánea, Marbella
Would we be before the missing link in the same way that in the Darwin theory of the evolution? Or as Stephen Hawking said “does the universe extend to the space endlessly? And if it was true that “although the universe seems to have the same aspect everywhere, it changes with the passing of time” and we are before at least, two scientific claims:
FIRST—The universe extends endlessly
SECOND—The universe changes with the passing of time
These two conclusions would be enough to question almost all the things we know in other fields, then we could think in the socio-spatial field that:
FIRST—The subject extends or exceeds complete objectivity inside the unconscious.
SECOND—The subject is a field of tensions, timeless, that changes and develops or succumbs in this double sense that is sometimes interpreted in the dreams, according to Sigmund Freud ´s theory.
In this way, immersing in the past in an analytic act, associating in the analysis, could indicate that the time has only one direction, that in the subject area, the time focuses on multiple places and mixes with the present and the past and future, with that ”magical” capacity with which the psychoanalysis tackle the treatment”.
These empty spaces of the knowledge in science and psychology, are also present in the complete development of the mind, even in those games like chess or the Go in which we try to manipulate the empty space in our favour searching positions on the board where we make unexpected movements get a benefit and to win.
In football terms, which shouldn’t be seen as minor art, handling the emptiness helped to lay the foundations of the game with the empty space getting such a position that could lead to the long-awaited goal and together with other strategic movements would reach an assured success.
In chess, more complex than football, there is a similar idea since it is about monopolizing the centre of the board with the goal of getting a solid position and in this way being the leader in the game.
Few times, we get to beat a competitor in this category, that a player gets the empty space in the centre of the board. However, this advantage isn’t always decisive, or harmful for the following developments of the game.
The first great theoreticians of chess understood that the control of the centre of the board was the Cartesian axis to win a game.
Kasparov, a fuori clase, beats the most modern computers, analysts and even his rivals. Then, he decides to deal with Politics and faces Puttin himself, with a free market individualist speech. He has never forgotten the centre of the board, not even in Politics.
Maradona, another fuori clase, that used to see the 360º of the field all the time, in front of him or behind him, on his right or on his left, and used to place the ball where one player from his team had to reach and generally with his back to the defender and wrongfooting him. In politics he has done the opposite. He has hugged Chavez and Fidel and has tattooed Che together with his mother and his grandson showing the latent contradiction between what it could be and what it is. The same has happened to his career of continuous rebirth, self boycott, drugs and genius on the same board. Beating nobody is like beating all the rivals, in the gullible Maradonian universe.
Messi is the adaptation to the rule. He is great, but he doesn’t speak outside the field, he is the player par excellence, the distinguished soloist in the group. No words.
In Diego Maradona the use of the emptiness appears in a simple way creating the option of a positional benefit in the game that has changed football for ever. The excess of words has removed brightness and meaning in the dawn of his career
Then, the next game always starts. Anyway the next one will be another match. However, each game is a matter of life and death.
The space can be empty, but not the place since it is the sum of several physical, symbolic, magical, real or virtual elements, which feeds and generates this subject, sometimes without taking notice of this.
These elements take up that space, which paraphrasing Einstein theory, would be something like the “socio-psychological permanent feature” like underlying energy in “the empty space”
The fact that the emptiness is different from the void is fascinating, and it is even more fascinating that it can cause over itself a constructive effect of the subject’s parts which leads him through a new path.